There chaos strategy
All against all: it is the media image of chaos that is spreading like a blur oil on the southern shore of the Mediterranean, from Libya to Syria. A situation that even Washington seems to face helpless.
In reality Washington is not the sorcerer's apprentice unable to control forces set in motion. It is the driving force of a strategy - that of chaos - that, demolishing entire states, causes a reaction a chain of conflicts to be used according to the ancient method of "divide et impera".
Gone out winners from the cold war in 1991, the US has self-appointed «The only state with a force, a scope and influence in each dimension - politics, economic and military - truly global ", proposing to "prevent any hostile power from dominating one region - Western Europe, East Asia, the territory of the former Soviet Union and Southwest Asia (the Middle East) - whose resources would be sufficient to generate a global power ".
Since the US and NATO under their command have fragmented or demolished with war, one after the other, States deemed to be an obstacle to global domination plan - Iraq, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and others - while others still (including Iran and the Venezuela) I'm in the crosshairs.
In the same strategy is part of the coup d'état in Ukraine under US / NATO direction, in order to provoke a new cold war in Europe to isolate the Russia and strengthen the influence of the United States in Europe. While political and media attention is focused on the conflict in Libya, the increasingly threatening scenario of the NATO escalation against Russia.
The meeting gods 29 foreign ministers, summoned on 4 April 2019 a Washington per celebrare i 70 years of NATO, It reaffirmed, without any proof, that «Russia violates the INF Treaty by deploying new ones in Europe nuclear-capable missiles ". One week later, on 11 April, there NATO has announced that this summer will be carried out "The update" of the US Aegis "missile defense" system deployed in Deveselu in Romania, assuring that this "will not provide no offensive capacity to the system ". Such a system, installed in Romania and Poland, and on board ships, it can instead launch not only interceptor missiles but also nuclear missiles.
Moscow has warned that, if the US will deploy nuclear missiles in Europe, there Russia will deploy similar targeted missiles on its territory on European bases.
Increase by Consequently, NATO spending on "defense": the military budgets of European and Canadian allies will grow in 2020 of 100 billions of dollars. NATO foreign ministers, gathered in Washington on 4 April, they made a particular commitment to «face actions aggressive Russia in the Black Sea region ", establishing «New measures to support our close partners, Georgia and Ukraine". The day after, dozens of ships and fighter-bombers of United States, Canada, Greece, Netherlands, Turkey, Romania and Bulgaria started a NATO war exercise in the Black Sea naval aircraft close to Russian territorial waters, using the ports of Odessa (Ukraine) and Poti (Georgia).
Simultaneously beyond 50 fighter-bombers of the United States, Germany, Great Britain, France and Holland, taking off from a Dutch airport and refueled in flight, they practiced «offensive air attack missions a targets on land or at sea ".
Italian fighter-bombers Eurofighter are instead sent by NATO to patrol the Baltic region again against the "threat" of Russian aircraft. The rope is tighter and tighter and can break (or be broken) at any time, dragging us into a much more dangerous chaos than the Libyan one.
Rand Corp.: how to bring down Russia
Force the opponent to extend excessively to unbalance him e tear it down: it is not a judo move but the plan against Russia developed by the Rand Corporation, the most influential US think tank that, with a staff of thousands of experts, looks like the most trusted worldwide source of intelligence and policy analysis for i US rulers and their allies.
In the queue Body. prides himself on having helped shape the strategy for a long time a term that allowed the United States to emerge victorious from the war cold, forcing the Soviet Union to consume its own economic resources in the strategic comparison.
To this model is inspired by the new plan, «Overextending and Unbalancing Russia», published by Rand. According to his analysts, the Russia remains a powerful competitor of the United States in some fields fundamental. For this the US must pursue, together with theirs allies, an overall long-term strategy that leverages his vulnerability. Various ways to coerce are then explored Russia to get out of balance, indicating for each the probabilities of success, the benefits, the costs and risks for the US.
The analysts Rand believe that Russia's greatest vulnerability is the economic one, due to its strong dependence on the export of oil and gas, whose revenues can be reduced by weighing down the sanctions and increasing US energy exports. You have to make sure that Europe decreases the import of Russian natural gas, replacing it with liquefied natural gas transported by sea from other countries.
Another way to damage Russia's economy over time is to encourage the emigration of qualified personnel, in particular Russian youth with a high degree of education.
In the field ideological and informative, internal protests should be encouraged e at the same time undermine the image of Russia on the outside, expelling it from international forums and boycotting events international sports that it organizes.
In the field geopolitical, arming Ukraine allows the US to exploit the Russia's point of greatest external vulnerability, but that must be calibrated to keep Russia under pressure without arriving to a great conflict in which it would prevail.
In the field military the US can have high benefits, with low costs e risks, by the increase of the land forces of European countries of NATO in an anti-Russia function. The US can have highs probability of success and high benefits, with moderate risks, especially by investing more in strategic bombers e long-range attack missiles directed against Russia.
Exit the Inf Treaty and to deploy new nuclear-range missiles in Europe intermediate betting on Russia ensures their high odds of success, but it also carries high risks.
Calibrating every option to achieve the desired effect - conclude the Rand analysts - Russia will eventually pay the most price high in comparison with the US, but these too will have to invest large resources subtracting them to other purposes.
They announce thus a further sharp increase in US / NATO military spending a detriment of social expenses. This is the future that lies ahead Rand Corporation, the most influential think tank in the deep state, that is, the underground center of real power held by the economic oligarchies, financial and military, what it determines the strategic choices not only of the US but of the entire West. The "options" provided by the plan are really just variations of the same war strategy, whose price in terms of sacrifices e risks is paid for by all of us.